Reply To: 2015 Endgame Recruiting

[-PLASMA]

#7821

That’s exactly it perspective, an idea dosen’t need to even be considered for to have not been shot down, my opinion unless I
specificly straight up said “no, no way, no how” then I’m not shooting it down
the definition of the phrase from the dictionary:

“shoot down
1. To bring down (an aircraft, for example) by hitting and damaging with gunfire or a missile.
2. Informal To ruin the aspirations of; disappoint.
3. Informal
a. To put an end to; defeat: shot down the proposal.
b. To expose as false; discredit: shot down his theory.”

None of which happened even if you feel that it did. Didn’t put an end to it and didn’t expose it as false or discredit the
possiblity of it happening. What we actually have at the moment is a disagreement of how you felt it has recieved as opposedto how it was intented as can often happen through text. Opinions can absolutly be wrong if I say “In my opinion we have 6 fingers”
or “In my opinion Hitler was an amazing person who wouldn’t harm a fly” am I not wrong? or even my interpretation of the definition
can be wrong, also considering both of us can’t be right on this. However I do agree with you on tomo, he’s a cool dude and it does
fall into the grey area as it’s not quite…I wanna say big enough to be considered a merger but is very similar, assuming he does
actually pull them over.